How we choose sources, handle conflicts, evaluate evidence directness, and avoid citation laundering.
Our sources policy matches source type to claim type. The manufacturer's order page can be the best source for today's package price while being a weak source for independent evidence of effectiveness. We don't use one source type to answer every kind of question.
This is exactly why our Ingredients page distinguishes ingredient-level research (like the saw palmetto and pygeum africanum studies) from claims about ViriFlow as a finished, combined formula.
When sources disagree — for example, when one saw palmetto trial shows a benefit and another shows no significant effect over placebo — we compare how current, direct, and independent each source is, and whether they're actually measuring the same outcome. Where real uncertainty remains after that comparison, we say so directly rather than picking whichever result sounds better.
Important health and commercial claims are supported near the relevant section of text, with a references list that lets readers inspect the underlying source themselves — not buried in a single, disconnected references page at the end. See this in practice on our Ingredients page, where each ingredient's evidence badge sits directly next to its claim.
We prioritize primary product information, regulatory sources, peer-reviewed research, and recognized clinical guidance. Manufacturer claims are not treated as independent clinical evidence.
Editorial owner: ViriFlow Editorial Team · Last reviewed: July 10, 2026
Visit the current ViriFlow order page to review the latest package pricing, shipping, and guarantee terms before ordering.
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission if you purchase through this link, at no additional cost to you.